Kevin Rudd doesn't want you to have your own money

 

 

It took me a while to realise it because usually, people who enter politics have some smarts and go in wanting to do what they believe is the right thing.  

 

 
They pursue policies they believe will make our country an even better place.
 
That is why I have been at a loss to understand how a group of people who promised us in the lead up to the last election that they were "economic conservatives" who "believed in surpluses" could turn a low unemployment surplus economy into one with rising job losses, record spending and historic debt levels.
 
Then it hit me – it is not that Labor can't manage money – it is that they actually don't want us to get ahead and have our own money.  
 
They are actually doing what they believe in.
 
You hear it everyday in Parliament with senior Labor members deriding Malcolm and Lucy Turnbull’s success. The truth is that the Turnbull’s are wealthy and successful because they worked hard and took their chances. Australia was built on the back on entrepreneurs like the Turnbull’s.
 
Labor and their cheer squad in the left love debt and they love having Australians in debt because it increases reliance on the State.
 
When the country is in debt we see interest rates go up and taxes go up - leaving Australians with less money in their pocket.
 
But when debt is paid off, taxes are low, interest rates are low, business is confident and people have more money.
 
When this happens, Australians become self reliant and take on more responsibility for themselves and for their family.
 
Small business prospers and people get jobs.
 
We saw this happen during the Howard Government.
 
During this period debt was reduced to zero, taxes and interest rates were low, business boomed and real wages went up, Australians took the opportunity to be responsible for themselves and for their families.  
 
Many entered the housing market, buying their first home, many for the first time only to be derided by the left as living in “McMansions”.
 
Australians bought new electrical products and home wares, they took their families on outings and on holidays - and were decried by the left as being “affluent” and “greedy”.
 
Small businesses and private contractors boomed, creating real jobs and removing the need for unions - and were dismissed by the left as “part time” or “casual”.
 
More Australians got an opportunity at work and not just part time and casual work, full time jobs. For years the left complained about the casualisation of the workforce only to complain some more about the policies that produced the full time jobs! Go figure.
 
Of course Labor and the left dismissed these achievements as being the result of a ‘mining boom’, not because of dedicated and focused economic policy.
 
Australians reduced their reliance on the state, taking out private health insurance and sending their children to non government schools - all the while being heckled as "selfish" by the left.
 
Labor and the left loathe aspiration because they know it makes them irrelevant.
 
That's why Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swan have declared war on aspiration - and have begun dismantling incentives for people to take responsibility for themselves.
 
Their actions on superannuation, private health insurance and solar rebates are just the beginning and the sooner they are stopped the quicker our country will recover.
 
The Liberal Party has always stood for policies built around self reliance, individual responsibility, small business growth and strong economic management.
 
Some people will question whether this kind of government is still relevant in the current economic climate - I say yes it is now more than ever.
 
What has become very clear over the past eighteen months is that - despite all the talk - the Liberal Party stands for wealth creation and independence, the Labor Party, the opposite.




Comments

Pam Graham
# Pam Graham
Friday, July 03, 2009 4:57 PM
I found the reference to the wealth of the Turnbull's somewhat puzzling. I did not realise that wealth or lack of it decided a Politician's ability. If Mr Turnbull is successful financially then that is a good indicator for me. If the Liberal Party had not left a sizeable amount in the treasure chest where would Swann have gor the money from to BUY gullible voters.
Lorraine Parsons
# Lorraine Parsons
Friday, July 03, 2009 7:19 PM
Dear Jamie,

I must say that I'm rather disappointed with some of the comments that you've made. Firstly, I think that the previous government was lucky that we DID have the mining boom - it certainly helped the coffers in general. Yes, there was a surplus but there should or could have been much more spending on infrastructure e.g. schools, hospitals, roads & water etc.

I have no problems with self-reliance (I actually think that we have far too much social security & during the 'boom' years, anyone capable of working should have been made to or else loose their benefits).

However, I work for an association whose members are in the Finance Industry. It's clear to most intelligent people in Australia, that one of the main reasons that the world, lead by the mightly US of A, got into trouble was corporate greed. The obscene salaries & bonuses that executives gave themselves, whilst the others with a job were the 'working poor' certainly attributed to the GFC. Whilst now in USA limits on these incomes have been capped, it has not happened here. One cannot honestly say that CEO's in Australian banks earn multi-million salaries, 'because they work hard' whilst the front-line staff are offered mere crumbs!

Another reason that the GFC was a disaster waiting to happen (& again, being involved in the Finance industry - we could see the 'tsunami' coming) was that people spent way & above their means & yes, some did build 'McMansions'. Again, the financial institutions were instruments of greed, getting people to borrow & spend, pushing staff to reach unrealistic goals to ensure executives enjoyed huge bonuses. We are now reaping the crop of misery from the seeds of greed that were sown.

In addition, may jobs created were casual or part-time with Australia having, at the time of WorkChoices, the 2nd highest rate of casualised work-force in the developed world.

Most Australians applaud someone who geniunely has got ahead in life thanks to hard work - myself included. It's interesting to note that you say the previous government created real jobs & removed the need for Unions. If you had heard some of the horror-stories of how some people were treated under WorkChoices (I've spoken to people in this situation & I would not lie or fabricate a story) there would be a realisation that there is always a need for Unions. Stories abounded of young workers being treated appallingly & if I was a parent with a teenage son/daughter I would always want a well-informed, professional, caring and empowered association looking after my child. (Fortunately, my 2 sons, now in their 20's are able to look after themselves & have always been Union members for their respective professions.)

Employers have their own Unions or Associations - employers have bodies such as The Chamber of Commerce, The Employers Association etc. You may recall the surgeons at RAH who threatened to resign last year unless a generous pay deal was delivered. I don't think (or I very much doubt) if any of those were fully paid up members of the Port Adelaide branch of the Labour Party! However, their 'union' the AMA fought their battles. Everyone is entitled to representation & a voice in the workplace, regardless of their occupation.

I am frustrated by the lack of progress re: Climate Change and both the previous & current governments are remiss in this area. I think that jobs can grow expotentially with opportunities in the 'green renewable energy' industries - we do not need to rely on dirty or dangerous energy sources such as coal or nuclear.

Like yourself, I fully agree that we have to encourage self-reliance, individual responsibility, small business growth and strong economic management. Any intelligent person wants that as it ensures prosperity, opportunities, a fair & caring society with a decent set of values. It's all in the implementation.

I'm also not saying that I agree 100% with everything that Labor has done. However, the $900 stimulus package has encouraged spending in many areas.(I'm helping support the tourism industry & hence jobs,with a holiday in WA in September.) In the current world economic climate, the current government had limited options & had to take SOME action to kick-start the economy & this was their measure.

I do not disagree with all of your sentiments expressed but I think that you are unfairly & unnecessarily harsh on the current government, when 12 years of Howard government left much to be desired.

Yours sincerely,

Lorraine Parsons.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website